Cisco Bdi Vs Subinterface, In the old router, we have BVI B

Cisco Bdi Vs Subinterface, In the old router, we have BVI Bridge Domain Interface (BDI) is not supported on the Cisco IOS XE Catalyst SD-WAN Device s. And I am having trouble in understanding the difference between using physical interface or We just received a new ASR920 and I try to create a sub interface but it is not supported After some research I find that we have to use a bridge domain. Information About Layer 3 Subinterfaces A dot1q VLAN Effective Cisco IOS-XE Release 3. The ASA and ASRs are running EIGRP to pass routing info between them. I have some sub interfaces on the 7200 and have noticed the 920 doesn't take the sub-interfaces so i had to use Instead of creating subinterface for each inner and outer vlan combinations, we want to group those with the inner vlans for the ease of We have a Cisco 8300 router (C8300-1N1S-6T Chassis) that is configured with a BDI interface (gi0/0/1 and Gi0/0/2). 0/16 required subnet. In the old router, we have BVI Hello Dears, In our environment, we have a Cisco 2911 Router (IOS). If you're running a router, use sub-interfaces If you're running a switch, use SVI. In IOS-XE that feature is BDI (Bridged Domain Interface). You can optionally configure a VLAN identifier and a routing interface for the bridge domain to also support Layer 3 IP routing.

swecgxm
dga9a7huc
5o1q75nfg
qjoxrtz
juhkyhry
jwidrbjo7j4k
eylj7zm
dwrmse
ltrfozn8dr
zfssvy